Friday, March 7, 2014

Loss of privilege is not persecution

Ross Douthat:
Christians had plenty of opportunities — thousands of years’ worth — to treat gay people with real charity, and far too often chose intolerance. (And still do, in many instances and places.) So being marginalized, being sued, losing tax-exempt status — this will be uncomfortable, but we should keep perspective and remember our sins, and nobody should call it persecution.
...
[U]sing the “persecution” label too promiscuously, I think, carries three risks beyond intellectual inaccuracy. First..., it doesn’t do enough to acknowledge the vast gulf separating the situation of Western Christians and the incredible heroism of our co-believers overseas, who face eliminative violence on an increasingly-dramatic scale. Second, as I tried to suggest in the column, it doesn’t do enough to acknowledge the gulf separating the situation of Western Christians and the situation of gays and lesbians, past and present, facing persecutionat the hands of religiously-motivated actors. And finally, it doesn’t actually prepare conservative believers for a future as a (hopefully creative) religious minority, because it conditions them/us to constantly expect some kind of grand tribulation that probably won’t actually emerge.
Perspective in all things.  Losing privilege is not persecution . As a reader of Andrew Sullivan's wrote recently:
American Christians are about to learn what it means to live in a country whose culture and values and attitudes don’t fully replicate their own. That is all....Their outrage ... is really a reaction to a loss of prestige, a loss of a sense of centrality, a loss of the sense that this is their country and they are the normal ones, and it’s only natural and correct that the culture and the law should reflect their values and their attitudes.

1 comment:

JCF said...

"Christians had plenty of opportunities — thousands of years’ worth — to treat gay people with real charity, and far too often chose intolerance."

Hmmm. For good or ill, this feeds into the narrative (shared by all sides) that there have been "gay people" around for "thousands of years": acting well or poorly, being treated well or poorly.

Intimations of gayness (of homosexual orientation) such as in Plato's "Symposium" (Aristophanes' two headed creatures---m/f, m/m, f/f---split, and looking for their other halves) does not a gay identity make [Ditto all the "Two-Spirit" gender/sexually-different traditions elsewhere]

It's only in the past 100 years (if that) in North America/Europe, that a (usually) young person can translate their innate sense of difference and, w/ or w/o definite attraction to persons of the same sex, translate this innate sense to the identity claim "I am gay/lesbian/bisexual".

There just aren't "thousands of years" of such experiences of identity (much less community of same!) to draw on [Whereas hundreds of years of men getting criminally caught having sex w/ men, yes. And secret sexual experimentation of everybody having sex w/ everybody! (though even then, two females having sex may not have even thought of themselves as "having sex". It's complicated! ;-p]